<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>systemcall dot org &#187; OSS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.systemcall.org/blog/category/tech/oss/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.systemcall.org/blog</link>
	<description>Security, development and a bit of madness</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 21:29:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Science vs. Business</title>
		<link>http://www.systemcall.org/blog/2011/07/science-vs-business/</link>
		<comments>http://www.systemcall.org/blog/2011/07/science-vs-business/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jul 2011 18:24:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rengolin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OSS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rengolin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.systemcall.org/blog/?p=750</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Since the end of the dark ages, and the emergence of modern capitalism, science has been connected to business, in one way or another. During my academic life and later (when I moved to business), I saw the battle of those that would only do pure science (with government funding) and those that would mainly [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.systemcall.org/blog/2011/07/science-vs-business/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fool me once, shame on you&#8230; fool me twice, shame on me (DBD)</title>
		<link>http://www.systemcall.org/blog/2010/10/fool-me-once-shame-on-you-fool-me-twice-shame-on-me-dbd/</link>
		<comments>http://www.systemcall.org/blog/2010/10/fool-me-once-shame-on-you-fool-me-twice-shame-on-me-dbd/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Oct 2010 14:17:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rengolin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OSS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rengolin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unix/Linux]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.systemcall.org/blog/?p=612</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Defective by design came with a new story on Apple&#8217;s DRM. While I don&#8217;t generally re-post from other blogs (LWN already does that), this one is special, but not for the apparent reasons. I agree that DRM is bad, not just for you but for business, innovation, science and the evolution of mankind. But that&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.systemcall.org/blog/2010/10/fool-me-once-shame-on-you-fool-me-twice-shame-on-me-dbd/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Ubuntu Way</title>
		<link>http://www.systemcall.org/blog/2010/05/the-ubuntu-way/</link>
		<comments>http://www.systemcall.org/blog/2010/05/the-ubuntu-way/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 May 2010 19:12:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rengolin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[OSS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rengolin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unix/Linux]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.systemcall.org/blog/?p=474</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s been five years now that I switched from Debian to Ubuntu, primarily for the updated software and radical changes in the user interface, and there are quite a few things that were constant all this time. When on Debian, I always used the unstable branch. It was the obvious choice for a non-mission-critical desktop [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.systemcall.org/blog/2010/05/the-ubuntu-way/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Barrelfish</title>
		<link>http://www.systemcall.org/blog/2010/03/barrelfish/</link>
		<comments>http://www.systemcall.org/blog/2010/03/barrelfish/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 20:37:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rengolin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Algorithms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Devel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Distributed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OSS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rengolin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.systemcall.org/blog/?p=441</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Minix seems to be inspiring more operating systems nowadays. Microsoft Research is investing on a micro-kernel (they call it multi-kernel, as there are slight differences) called Barrelfish. Despite being Microsoft, it&#8217;s BSD licensed. The mailing list looks pretty empty, the last snapshot is half a year ago and I couldn&#8217;t find an svn repository, but [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.systemcall.org/blog/2010/03/barrelfish/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2010 &#8211; Year of what?</title>
		<link>http://www.systemcall.org/blog/2010/01/2010-year-of-what/</link>
		<comments>http://www.systemcall.org/blog/2010/01/2010-year-of-what/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 23:54:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rengolin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OSS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Physics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rengolin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unix/Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.systemcall.org/blog/?p=422</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ever since 1995 I hear the same phrase, and ever since 2000 I stopped listening. It was already the year of Linux in 95 for me, so why bother? But this year is different, and Linux is not the only revolution in town&#8230; By the end of last year, the first tera-electronvolt collisions were recorded [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.systemcall.org/blog/2010/01/2010-year-of-what/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Linux is whatever you want it to be</title>
		<link>http://www.systemcall.org/blog/2009/11/linux-is-whatever-you-want-it-to-be/</link>
		<comments>http://www.systemcall.org/blog/2009/11/linux-is-whatever-you-want-it-to-be/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 18:18:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rengolin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[OSS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rengolin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unix/Linux]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.systemcall.org/blog/?p=366</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Normally the Linux Magazine has great articles. Impartial, informative and highly technical. Unfortunately, not always. In a recent article, some perfectionist zealot stated that Ubuntu makes Linux looks bad. I couldn&#8217;t disagree more. Ubuntu is a fast-paced, fast-adapted Linux. I was one of the early adopters and I have to say that most of the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.systemcall.org/blog/2009/11/linux-is-whatever-you-want-it-to-be/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gtk example</title>
		<link>http://www.systemcall.org/blog/2009/09/gtk-example/</link>
		<comments>http://www.systemcall.org/blog/2009/09/gtk-example/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 22:22:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rengolin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Devel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OSS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rengolin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unix/Linux]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.systemcall.org/blog/?p=356</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gtk, the graphical interface behind Gnome, is very simple to use. It doesn&#8217;t have an all-in-one IDE such as KDevelop, which is very powerful and complete, but it features a simple and functional interface designer called Glade. Once you have the widgets and signals done, filling the blanks is easy. As an example, I wrote [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.systemcall.org/blog/2009/09/gtk-example/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SLC 0.2.0</title>
		<link>http://www.systemcall.org/blog/2009/09/slc-0-2-0/</link>
		<comments>http://www.systemcall.org/blog/2009/09/slc-0-2-0/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 22:27:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rengolin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Algorithms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Devel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OSS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rengolin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.systemcall.org/blog/?p=329</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My pet compiler is now sufficiently stable for me to advertise it as a product. It should deal well with the most common cases if you follow the syntax, as there are some tests to assure minimum functionality. The language is very simple, called &#8220;State Language&#8220;. This language has only global variables and static states. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.systemcall.org/blog/2009/09/slc-0-2-0/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>40 years and full of steam</title>
		<link>http://www.systemcall.org/blog/2009/08/40-years-and-full-of-steam/</link>
		<comments>http://www.systemcall.org/blog/2009/08/40-years-and-full-of-steam/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 10:26:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rengolin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OSS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rengolin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unix/Linux]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.systemcall.org/blog/?p=315</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Unix is turning 40 and BBC folks wrote a small article about it. What a joy to remember when I started using Unix (AIX on an IBM machine) around 1994 and was overwhelmed by it. By that time, the only Unix that ran well on a PC was SCO and that was a fortune, but [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.systemcall.org/blog/2009/08/40-years-and-full-of-steam/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FSF Settles Suit Against Cisco</title>
		<link>http://www.systemcall.org/blog/2009/05/fsf-settles-suit-against-cisco/</link>
		<comments>http://www.systemcall.org/blog/2009/05/fsf-settles-suit-against-cisco/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 21:32:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rengolin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Devel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OSS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rengolin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unix/Linux]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.systemcall.org/blog/?p=274</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The long dispute with Cisco has finally come to an agreement. For me, that means two things: first, they&#8217;re not trolls sucking money from the big corps for stupid patent infringement, as some might fear. Second, they&#8217;re very patient, understanding and sometimes a bit too naive. Why the fear? When building embedded systems or when [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.systemcall.org/blog/2009/05/fsf-settles-suit-against-cisco/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

