<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>systemcall dot org &#187; Nano Tech</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.systemcall.org/blog/category/tech/nano-tech/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.systemcall.org/blog</link>
	<description>Security, development and a bit of madness</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 15:05:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>How close is nano-computing?</title>
		<link>http://www.systemcall.org/blog/2007/10/how-close-is-nano-computing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.systemcall.org/blog/2007/10/how-close-is-nano-computing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 21:13:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rengolin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nano Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Physics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rengolin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://systemcall.org/2007/10/25/how-close-is-nano-computing/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In September, Sunny Bains wrote Why Nano still macro? and since then I&#8217;m thinking about it once in a while. Recently, a study in the University of California showed how to create a demodulator using nanotubes. So far there were advances in memory containers such as this and that and also batteries but all of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.systemcall.org/blog/2007/10/how-close-is-nano-computing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

