<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>systemcall dot org &#187; InfoSec</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.systemcall.org/blog/category/tech/info-sec/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.systemcall.org/blog</link>
	<description>Security, development and a bit of madness</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 15:05:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Acceptable</title>
		<link>http://www.systemcall.org/blog/2010/02/acceptable/</link>
		<comments>http://www.systemcall.org/blog/2010/02/acceptable/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 22:10:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rengolin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[InfoSec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rengolin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.systemcall.org/blog/?p=429</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A long time ago I read an article about some dangerous psychological studies in the 70&#8242;s. It&#8217;s funny to think that, at that time, things that we don&#8217;t even consider doing, were acceptable. Can you imagine yourself with a periscope counting the seconds some truck drivers take to piss in a public toilet? Or pretending [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.systemcall.org/blog/2010/02/acceptable/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Smart Grid Privacy</title>
		<link>http://www.systemcall.org/blog/2009/12/smart-grid-privac/</link>
		<comments>http://www.systemcall.org/blog/2009/12/smart-grid-privac/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 21:52:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rengolin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Digital Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Distributed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[InfoSec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rengolin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.systemcall.org/blog/?p=383</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have recently joined the IETF Smart Grid group to see what people were talking about it and to put away my fears on security and privacy. What I saw was a bunch of experts discussing the plethora of standards that could be applied (very important) but few people seemed too interested in the privacy [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.systemcall.org/blog/2009/12/smart-grid-privac/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Online gaming experience</title>
		<link>http://www.systemcall.org/blog/2009/08/online-gaming-experience/</link>
		<comments>http://www.systemcall.org/blog/2009/08/online-gaming-experience/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 16:14:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rengolin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Games]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[InfoSec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rengolin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.systemcall.org/blog/?p=306</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why is it so hard for the game industry to get the online experience? I understand the media industry being utterly ignorant about how to make sense of the internet, but gaming is about pure fun, isn&#8217;t it? The new survey done in UK is more than proof of the obvious fact that people will [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.systemcall.org/blog/2009/08/online-gaming-experience/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Net neutrality</title>
		<link>http://www.systemcall.org/blog/2009/05/net-neutrality/</link>
		<comments>http://www.systemcall.org/blog/2009/05/net-neutrality/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 10:20:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rengolin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Digital Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[InfoSec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rengolin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.systemcall.org/blog/?p=278</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Since the early days (millions of years ago), the human race is being watched. Not by any sort of god or alien race, but by itself. During the cave age, human-apes lived in groups. Either on trees or proper caves, they were all together. It was, then, pretty impossible to do something and not being [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.systemcall.org/blog/2009/05/net-neutrality/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Spam is good for you</title>
		<link>http://www.systemcall.org/blog/2009/04/spam-is-good-for-you/</link>
		<comments>http://www.systemcall.org/blog/2009/04/spam-is-good-for-you/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 22:19:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rengolin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Digital Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[InfoSec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rengolin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.systemcall.org/blog/?p=260</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Spam is good for you, at least better than you may think. Spam accounts for three quarters of all emails sent worldwide and some even attached carbon footprint to it (and here one of the reasons why it&#8217;s nonsense). But it&#8217;s good for you in ways that does not meet the eye very easily and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.systemcall.org/blog/2009/04/spam-is-good-for-you/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Genome</title>
		<link>http://www.systemcall.org/blog/2009/03/genome/</link>
		<comments>http://www.systemcall.org/blog/2009/03/genome/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 21:13:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rengolin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[InfoSec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rengolin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.systemcall.org/blog/?p=219</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Would you give away your genome to research? It&#8217;s a bit tricky to define what kind of research and who will have access to it to do what&#8230; I would kindly give mine, if it was licensed GPLv3.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.systemcall.org/blog/2009/03/genome/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gates the Hutt</title>
		<link>http://www.systemcall.org/blog/2009/02/gates-the-hutt/</link>
		<comments>http://www.systemcall.org/blog/2009/02/gates-the-hutt/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 16:13:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rengolin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[InfoSec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rengolin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.systemcall.org/blog/?p=194</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bill Gates might not be heading Microsoft anymore but his legacy (through his stupid padawan, Ballmer) still remains. Not only they&#8217;re careless when writing bogus software, not fixing security holes and creating useless solutions to help you protect you, now they&#8217;re using the money you pay (if you do buy Windows, anyway) to set bounties [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.systemcall.org/blog/2009/02/gates-the-hutt/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who&#8217;s afraid of the big bad code?</title>
		<link>http://www.systemcall.org/blog/2009/01/whos-afraid-of-the-big-bad-code/</link>
		<comments>http://www.systemcall.org/blog/2009/01/whos-afraid-of-the-big-bad-code/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 00:11:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rengolin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Devel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[InfoSec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rengolin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.systemcall.org/blog/?p=167</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What would Bruce Schneier say about the magic list that the NSA is putting together with Microsoft and Symantec of the 25 biggest errors in code that normally lead to a security flaw. Don&#8217;t get me wrong, putting out a list of bad practices is a fantastic job, that&#8217;s for sure. It makes programmers more [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.systemcall.org/blog/2009/01/whos-afraid-of-the-big-bad-code/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Recursive hacking law</title>
		<link>http://www.systemcall.org/blog/2009/01/recursive-hacking-law/</link>
		<comments>http://www.systemcall.org/blog/2009/01/recursive-hacking-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 23:32:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rengolin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[InfoSec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rengolin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.systemcall.org/blog/?p=165</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to BBC, the new European strategy against cybercrime encourages the police to hack the hacker. I just wonder if the European Union has any idea of what the word &#8216;hack&#8217; really means or how gray is the area between white hats and black hats and, more importantly, that both types live on both sides [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.systemcall.org/blog/2009/01/recursive-hacking-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bad Vista</title>
		<link>http://www.systemcall.org/blog/2008/08/bad-vista/</link>
		<comments>http://www.systemcall.org/blog/2008/08/bad-vista/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 22:09:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rengolin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[InfoSec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rengolin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://systemcall.org/2008/08/08/bad-vista/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ooops, they did it again&#8230; A whole new hacking style was discovered due to the complete incompetence of Microsoft&#8217;s engineers. When will they understand that security means the opposite of trust? You can choose whatever framework you want (Java, .NET, ActiveX) build a simple program and have total control of the user&#8217;s machine in seconds. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.systemcall.org/blog/2008/08/bad-vista/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

