The end is near, at least for software patents |
| January 29th, 2009 under Articles, Digital Rights, Politics, rengolin, World. [ Comments: 1 ]
Ars Technica has a fantastic article on software patents in US, and how the process is slowly reversing to what it should be (and was) since the beginning.
They describe all the history, important cases, different points of view and how the whole thing was going nuts in this century. The system was due to fail since the big companies started paying billions for patent trolls, but it took a bit too long to actually start reversing…
Would that be Obama’s aura? Or does both events mean that the US people finally started to think on their own? Whatever that is, it’s in the right direction, I think.
Closed source development |
| January 28th, 2009 under Devel, Digital Rights, OSS, rengolin. [ Comments: none ]
While closed source development has its niche (and a very important one), it does feel a bit weird.
I’m now working on low-level development (debuggers) at ARM, one of the things I like most but also a rare thing to find good quality open source development (with the exception of the gnu tools, of course). Of course there is a portion of your work that goes back to the community (via open standards, limited support for the open tools) but it’s not easy to find a job to write code exclusively to the gdb or gcc.
What I’m finding weirder is the fact that the documentation you need is seldom on the Internet (Google or usenet). The good side is that the guys that created the standards and tools are at your doorstep, so it’s quite easy to get hold of them in case you need something off the charts. But that’s normally true with open source as well.
The other weird thing is knowing what you can tell and what you can’t. I have no idea of what part of my current project is public so I just don’t talk about anything of it. But I think that’s just a matter of getting used to, just like I did before. Besides, albeit at EBI I could even show my (or anybody else’s) source code, I don’t think that anybody ever cared that much.
At last, licences. It’s so easy when you develop GPL or LGPL (or similar). Just write whatever you want, use whatever library you need and put a GPL3 tag on your code. That’s it. Simple as that. Now I have to think what would be the impact of that library on the license of what I write, and that’s something I didn’t want to care…
Also, if a document is GPL-ed, you have to GPL it too. If it’s version 3, everything you write (including company’s previous ideas) become GPLv3 as well. That’s a big nuisance. I do understand GPLv3 for code, even apply that to my own source code, but it does annoy a lot when applied to documents.
Although weird for some reasons, it’s not bad at all. I have many more reasons to love my new job. Excellent team, great environment and an impressive code quality, which for me, is a must.
Music industry scrambles for cash? |
| January 21st, 2009 under Digital Rights, Media, OSS, rengolin. [ Comments: none ]
BBC link, It almost made me cry. At least, now, bands and writers can start making money out of their work…
Well, with Vista finally worthless and DRM abandoned for good, I can focus my attentions on things I like best: promoting open source software, low-level development and helping Camfed.
Who’s afraid of the big bad code? |
| January 14th, 2009 under Articles, Devel, InfoSec, Politics, rengolin. [ Comments: none ]
What would Bruce Schneier say about the magic list that the NSA is putting together with Microsoft and Symantec of the 25 biggest errors in code that normally lead to a security flaw.
Don’t get me wrong, putting out a list of bad practices is a fantastic job, that’s for sure. It makes programmers more aware of the dangers, and as the article says itself, newbies can learn from experience before getting into a new field.
But the way that (lay) people take it makes it so magical that the practical side of such list is greatly reduced.
Order and size of the list
I understand that the order must have some sense, but which? Is it ordered by number of attacks in the last 12 months? Or by the sum of all reported losses caused by them? Or by number of such errors found in common code (on those companies’ code, of course)? Or by any other subjective “importance” factor from a bunch of “Security Experts”?
Also, why 25? Why not 30? Who says that the 25th is so important to show up in the list and not the 26th?
We programmers know about most of them, know the problems they pose and normally how to fix them. We often want to fix them, but that normally requires some refactoring and now it’s time to implement those features that our client needs for the demo, right? We can think about that later… can we? Will we?
Than, NSA decides to make this a priority for the country and claim it as a national security problem. Big companies like fancy terms, and would strive to adopt any new standard that shows up in the market.
Then, comes down the VP of engineering and say:
“We need to make sure every programmer knows how to write code that is free of the top 25 errors.”
Done, he can put the GIF image from the NSA saying his company’s software is secure against all odds, according to the NSA and DHS.
Now, coders and technicians, tell me: Would any editor, IDE or compiler ever be able to spot those errors with 100% accuracy?
“Then we need to make sure every programming team has processes in place to find and fix these problems [in existing code] and has the tools needed to verify their code is as free of these errors,”
Of course not, but they will try, and Microsoft will put a beta on Visual C++ and other companies will tell their clients that their software is being tested with the new product and the clients will buy, after all, who are them to say anything about that matter?
Protect against who?
Now, after so much time and effort, 30+ companies and government departments working hard to come up with a (quite good) list of the most common errors that lead to security flaws for what?
“The real dedicated serial attacker will probably find a way in even if all these errors were removed. But a high school hacker with malicious intent – ankle-biters if you will – would be deterred from breaking in.”
WHAT?!?! All that to stop script-kids? For heavens’ sake, I thought they were serious on that… Well, maybe I expected too much from the NSA… again…
(Note: quotes from original article, ipsis litteris)
Recursive hacking law |
| January 13th, 2009 under Articles, Digital Rights, InfoSec, Politics, rengolin. [ Comments: none ]
According to BBC, the new European strategy against cybercrime encourages the police to hack the hacker.
I just wonder if the European Union has any idea of what the word ‘hack’ really means or how gray is the area between white hats and black hats and, more importantly, that both types live on both sides of the fence! Ask a hacker to define hacking and you’ll need a comfy sofa and someone else to actually hear the whole story.
The only problem with that is that it’s recursive. Once the police (and the private sector) hacks me, they become a hacker themselves, allowing me to hack them, on the interest of security based on the same law. Right?
What’s new on Windows 7? |
| January 13th, 2009 under rengolin, Software. [ Comments: 4 ]
After the buzz on Windows 7 I decided to take a look on a video posted (apparently by Microsoft itself) on youtube.
I was expecting to hear about the new Operating System, only to find out that everything that matters to MS is the Window Manager. No memory or CPU consumption reports, no filesystem or network configuration structure, nothing.
Anyway, I have to talk about the interface then… Now, is it only me or they’re copying what Gnome/Compiz is doing? Because, copying Apple it’s obvious, even Gnome/Compiz is at some extent.
First, window transparency and ALT-TAB with window thumbnails to select with your mouse. Done. Second, dragging icons to the taskbar, what’s new on THAT?!
But now, “something really cool we’re putting in Windows 7 is called ‘snap-to’ “?!?!? If I recall right, the graphical interface from the PARC team already had tiled/cascade window arrangement and undoubtedly Microsoft used that on Windows 3, so how is that cool in any way?
Well, they better have a much stabler environment and much lower footprint, otherwise they won’t have nothing really serious to show.
Vista is no more |
| January 10th, 2009 under Computers, Digital Rights, OSS, rengolin, Software, Unix/Linux. [ Comments: 2 ]
It still hasn’t gone to meet it’s maker, but it was also not as bad as it could’ve been.
After Windows Vista was launched with more PR and DRM than any other, Microsoft hoped to continue its domination of the market. Maybe afraid of the steep Linux increase in desktops (Ubuntu has a great role in that) and other market pressures, they’ve rushed out Vista with so many bugs and security flaws, so slow and with such a big memory and CPU footprint that not many companies really wanted to change their whole infrastructure to see it drawn a little later.
China government ditched it for XP because it was not stable enough to run the Olympics, only to find out that the alternative didn’t help at all.
All that crap helped a lot Linux (especially Ubuntu) jump on the desktop world. Big companies shipping Linux on lots of desktops and laptops, all netbooks with Linux as primary option, lay people now using Linux as they would use any other desktop OS. So, is it just because Vista is so bad? No. Not at all. Linux got really user friendly over the last five to ten years and it’s now as easy as any other.
Vista is so bad that Microsoft had to keep supporting Windows XP, they’re rushing again with Windows 7 and probably (hopefully) they’ll make the same mistakes again. It’s got so bad that the Free Software Foundation’s BadVista campaign is officially is closing down for good. For good as in: Victory!
Yes, victory because in one year they could show the world how bad Vista really is and how good the other opportunities are. Of course, they were talking about Linux and all the free software around, including the new gNewSense platform they’re building, but the victory is greater than that. The biggest message is that Windows is not the only solution to desktops, and most of the time, it’s the worst.
In conjunction with the DefectiveByDesign guys, they also showed how Vista (together with Sony, Apple, Warner et al) can completely destroy your freedom, privacy and entertainment. They were so successful in their quest that they’re closing doors to spend time (and donors’ money) in more important (and pressing) issues.
Now, they’re closing down but that doesn’t mean that the problem is over. The idea is to stabilise the market. Converting all Windows and Mac users to Linux wouldn’t be right, after all, each person is different. But the big challenge is to have users that need (or want) a Mac, to use a Mac. Who needs Windows and can afford to pay all extra software to protect your computer (but not your privacy), can use it. For developers the real environment is Unix, they should be able to get a good desktop and good development tools as well. It’s, at least, fair.
But for the majority of users, what they really want is a computer to browse the web, print some documents, send emails and for that, any of the three is good enough. All three are easy to install (or come pre-installed), all three have all the software you need and most operations and configurations are easy or automatic. It’s becoming more a choice of style and design than anything else.
Now that Apple got rid of all DRM crap, Spore was a fiasco so EA is selling games without DRM, the word is getting out. It’s a matter of time it’ll be a minor problem, too. Would DefectiveByDesign retire too? I truly hope so.
As an exercise to the reader, go to Google home page and search for the terms: “windows vista“. You’ll see the BadVista website in the first page. If you search for “DRM” you’ll also see the DefectiveByDesign web page as well. This is big, it means that lots and lots of websites are pointing to those websites when they’re talking about those subjects!
If you care enough and you have a Google user and is using the personalised Google search, you could search for those terms and press the up arrow symbol on those sites to make them go even higher in the rank. Can we make both be the first? I did my part already.